← all work
Sortika Case Study

Redesigning wealth management for first-time investors

Redesigning wealth management for first-time investors

Full redesignUX ResearchMobile AppShipped

When I joined Sortika, the app had a paradox at its heart: a smart financial planning product that its own users couldn't understand. I led the research end to end, found the comprehension gap driving churn, and rebuilt the core experience around how real savers think about money.

Surface

Mobile app
Wealth management & micro-savings

Role

UX Researcher & Designer
Solo research & design owner

Team
  • 2 developers
  • 2 product owners
  • 1 support specialist
Scope
  • 0→1 research strategy
  • UX / UI redesign
  • Prototyping & validation
Sortika app redesign: Savings and Dashboard screens
Problem

An app users couldn't understand. 26.4% of users had uninstalled, and nearly a fifth of them left for one reason: they didn't get how it worked.

Solution

A research-led redesign. I rebuilt the dashboard, savings, and investments around three personas, replacing jargon with plain language and goals.

Result

Research that changed the process. Stakeholders watched research drive design decisions and started building UX research into how they work.

0%
of users had uninstalled the app before the redesign
0+
survey responses grounding every design decision
0
personas built from research, driving the full revamp
Context

A promising product with a comprehension problem

Sortika is a Kenyan micro-savings and wealth management app. The pitch is compelling: smart financial planning and investing that earns above-market returns, built for people saving toward real life goals.

When I came on board as the UX researcher and designer, I inherited a product with strong ambition and weak comprehension. The app was hard to navigate, its services were unclear, and first-time investors bounced off concepts like peer-to-peer lending without ever understanding them.

"Out of 26.4% of users who uninstalled the app, 19.6% reported they did not understand how it works."

That single finding became the north star for everything that followed. This wasn't a visual polish project. It was a comprehension project.

Problem

Too many problems, too little time

I started with preliminary research: stakeholder interviews to learn what had been tried before, then a 500+ response survey run with the support team, moderated usability testing, and deep user interviews into how people actually think and talk about money.

The pain points clustered fast: impossible navigation, unclear services, no consistent way to save toward goals, confusing lending concepts, weak planning tools, and no real access to investments. More problems than any one sprint could fix.

So I ran a prioritization matrix with the team. It gave us a shared mental model and a consistent way to decide what to fix first, instead of arguing from opinions.

Prioritization matrix mapping Sortika pain points by priority and feasibility
The prioritization matrix: mapping every pain point by priority and feasibility so the team could agree on what to fix first.
Step 01

Stakeholder interviews

Mapped previous attempts and aligned on where research would pay off most.

Step 02 · 500+ responses

Survey

Surfaced concerns and improvement areas at a scale interviews couldn't reach.

Step 03

Usability testing

Moderated sessions identifying the biggest pain points in the live app.

Step 04

User interviews

Mental models, goals, and the real language of money.

Goals + North Star

Make the app explain itself

01

Make every service discoverable. No more hidden features; users should grasp what the app does within minutes.

02

Help users save consistently. Goals they set themselves, with visible progress that keeps them going.

03

Demystify investing. Plain-language tools plus a virtual assistant, so first-time investors never feel stuck.

Process + Key Insights

What the research actually told us

Key Insight 1

Navigation chaos. Users couldn't find services they needed because the information architecture mirrored the org chart, not their mental model. The fix had to be structural, not cosmetic.

Key Insight 2

The comprehension gap. 19.6% of churned users left because they didn't understand the app. Financial concepts were presented in industry language to people encountering them for the first time. Every screen had to teach.

Key Insight 3

Saving without a target fails. Users wanted to save but had no mechanism tying money to meaning. Goal-based saving, with categories and visible rates, turned an abstract habit into something concrete.

These insights distilled into three personas that drove every design decision before a single wireframe was drawn.

M

Matt, 29

Web developer
Pain points

Slow investment returns, hours lost tracking markets, burned by Ponzi schemes.

Goals

One app for all financial services and a real variety of market opportunities.

F

Filly, 35

Small-scale farmer
Pain points

Struggles to repay loans on time and understand complex financial platforms.

Goals

Learn about investing, and save for school fees, rent, and starting a business.

D

Deborah, 24

Accountant
Pain points

Frustrated by unsecured lending and waiting endlessly for returns.

Goals

Build emergency funds, invest, borrow when needed, and save for a holiday to the Maasai Mara.

Solution

Three flows, rebuilt around clarity

Every screen explains itself. Every number earns its place.

Overview of all redesigned Sortika app screens: goals, savings, investments, insights, and loan flows
The full set of redesigned screens: goals, savings, investments, insights, and loan management, all rebuilt around one visual language.
Sortika redesigned customer dashboard: targets, savings, loan limits, and investment overview
Design 1 / 3

The dashboard that orients

One home for everything: savings, loans, and investment containers with daily, weekly, and monthly targets, visible loan limits, and portfolio overviews. Users always know exactly where their money stands, the antidote to the navigation chaos from Key Insight 1.

Sortika redesigned Savings page: category breakdown, growth rate graph, goals, and transaction history
Design 2 / 3

Saving with a target

Goals users set themselves: emergency funds, holidays, school fees. Category breakdowns show where savings actually go, savings-rate graphs keep progress visible, and full transaction history makes every shilling traceable.

Sortika redesigned Investments page: portfolio distribution, suggestions, and virtual investing assistant
Design 3 / 3

Investing without the jargon

Portfolio distribution at a glance, curated suggestions with hypothetical projections, and a virtual investing assistant that answers questions in plain language the moment users feel stuck. Built directly from Key Insight 2: every screen teaches.

Detail: savings growth-rate graph and goal progress
Detail: the savings-rate graph and goal progress that keep saving visible and concrete.
Detail: portfolio distribution and investing suggestions
Detail: portfolio distribution at a glance, with curated suggestions in plain language.
Reflections

What this project taught me

Domain expertise is learnable, but only if you ask enough questions

I designed a financial app with no finance background. My team's generosity in explaining the domain made it possible, and it's why I now start every 0→1 project by learning the domain first.

Research is most powerful when stakeholders watch it work

The team didn't adopt UX research because I advocated for it. They adopted it because they saw findings turn into design decisions in real time. Show, don't tell.

Comprehension is a feature

For first-time investors, clarity isn't polish, it's the product. The highest-leverage design work here was translation: industry concepts into human language.

What I would do next

Run a longitudinal study on whether goal-based saving actually changes saving behavior over six months, and expand the virtual assistant from Q&A into proactive nudges.

← Back to all work
fin.